<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Machinima for Dummies: Valve "Not interested" in Machinima</title>
    <link>http://www.machinimafordummies.com/articles/2009/12/24/valve-not-interested-in-machinima</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Blogging the writing of  "Machinima For Dummies"</description>
    <item>
      <title>Valve &amp;quot;Not interested&amp;quot; in Machinima</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;And the big news at the end of the year keeps on coming: &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pixel Eyes Productions have been trying to get an answer out of Valve Entertainment forever on the subject on Machinima, and finally, &lt;a href="http://pixeleyesproductions.blogspot.com/2009/12/valve-is-not-interested-in-machinima.html"&gt;they&amp;#8217;ve got this&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;&amp;#8221;We are not interested in licensing our technology or IP for machinima. &lt;em&gt;This includes providing copyright approvals.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Emphasis mine) &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wow. That&amp;#8217;s kinda big news. The creators of arguably the best engine out there for high-quality Machinima has no interest in letting it extend beyond YouTube. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having said that, it&amp;#8217;s not new. I&amp;#8217;ve had similar conversations with iD Software in the past - the summary being &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re a games company, not a film company.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pixel Eyes have some interesting analysis on their blog. I haven&amp;#8217;t really thought through this news yet, so - what do you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:7fff747f-591e-4517-a394-557573f05b3a</guid>
      <author>Hugh "Nomad" Hancock</author>
      <link>http://www.machinimafordummies.com/articles/2009/12/24/valve-not-interested-in-machinima</link>
      <category>News</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Valve "Not interested" in Machinima" by Chapel Hill Real Estate</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Very well written :) but i need to dig some information on that. Thank you for sharing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:775d11e6-0097-482c-a3aa-2667da395454</guid>
      <link>http://www.machinimafordummies.com/articles/2009/12/24/valve-not-interested-in-machinima#comment-34416</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Valve "Not interested" in Machinima" by pornizle.org</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="www.pornizle.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;pornizle.org
  &lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;  &lt;a href="www.pornizle.org/liseli" rel="nofollow"&gt;liseli kızlar etek altlari videosu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://pornizle.org/kategoriler/Turk-Pornolar.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;kızlık bozma &lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://pornizle.org/kategoriler/Turk-Liseli-Gizli-Cekim-pornosu.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Türk Liseli Gizli Çekim pornosu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:91a06788-710f-4455-ab86-9e0355642a15</guid>
      <link>http://www.machinimafordummies.com/articles/2009/12/24/valve-not-interested-in-machinima#comment-34326</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Valve "Not interested" in Machinima" by Eddy</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is Eddy with Smooth Few Films. We made Day in the Life of a Turret, a fairly well known Portal video, as well as Leet World, a Counter-Strike: Source series. We stopped making Valve machinima for this very reason, from confirmation we received (that I can&amp;#8217;t go into the details of) that was largely the same response. Occurred about a year ago. It really is unfortunate that this is Valve&amp;#8217;s stance on machinima, but basically, we didn&amp;#8217;t want to waste any more of our time on something we couldn&amp;#8217;t pursue our dreams with.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:aebf807d-beb7-4846-b548-16e3bca258b6</guid>
      <link>http://www.machinimafordummies.com/articles/2009/12/24/valve-not-interested-in-machinima#comment-34315</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

